Argentina’s Tactical Problems: Foreseeable & Likely To Be Fatal

It should be obvious to everyone who has watched Argentina’s matches that the systems Alejandro Sabella’s team has so far used have not worked. The 5-3-2 experiment in the Bosnia & Herzegovina game was correctly halted at half-time but the 4-3-3 has looked little better in the last two-and-a-half games. The genius of Lionel Messi has dug them out of holes but it is a bit embarrassing that they have needed Messi to bail them out against Bosnia & Herzegovina, Iran and Nigeria. They were rather hoping that they would be able to hold that trump card in reserve until they faced Brazil in the final.

Argentina’s problems are many but can be simplified, and though they are simple, they are no less serious. In short: they have no attacking structure and not much in the way of defensive cohesion. They are a collection of brilliant individuals but not a good team.

As I wrote before the tournament:

From a tactical point of view, too, Argentina are at a disadvantage. They are likely to play a very vertical counter-attacking game, sitting deep and springing forward with Ángel Di María, Sergio Agüero and Gonzalo Higuaín as well as Messi, an approach which maximises the four’s individual ability by allowing them lots of space with which to work, but one that has no recent history of success at this level. There is not a great deal on the bench that suggests they are going to be capable of changing their approach should an opponent park the bus.

Alejandro Sabella’s men are likely to carry on the tradition established by sides like Jogi Löw’s Germany and José Mourinho’s Real Madrid, whose shock-and-awe reactivism destroyed most opponents who allowed themselves to be suckered in to playing high up the pitch, but collapsed when sides twigged what was going on and simply sat deep and refused to be drawn out. Romania, a limited side who will not be at the World Cup Finals, held Argentina to a goalless draw in March by doing exactly that.

So it has proved. Javier Mascherano and Fernando Gago, the two deep midfielders, don’t offer anything in the offensive phase; Messi, Higuaín and Agüero don’t do anything defensively; Pablo Zabaleta and Marcos Rojo rarely do much of anything at either end.

In open play, the creative burden seems to have been placed wholly on Lionel Messi and Ángel Di María, while getting the big guys on the end of set-pieces remains a secondary ploy. If the opposition simply crowd out Messi and Di María, they shut Argentina down. It is impossible for a side to win a World Cup if it is that easy to neutralise their attack.

Furthermore, every team Argentina faced in the group stage carved out incredibly good goalscoring opportunities. Bosnia & Herzegovina were unlucky to only register one, Iran could have had two or three and Nigeria’s two goals were just reward for their prowess on the break and Argentina’s lethargy in defence. The better sides they face later in the competition will be able to shut them down and pick them off with relative ease.

With all of the above being the case, what can Argentina do to prevent elimination? What will probably happen is that Ezequiel Lavezzi, formerly of Napoli and Paris Saint-Germain fame but currently best known for squirting his isotonic drink into Sabella’s face during the match against Nigeria, will take the now-injured Agüero’s place.

Lavezzi will demonstrate his usual hyperactivity, moving all over the attacking third and receiving the ball in wide positions, creating central space for Messi and Di María to move into, while also making diagonal runs between full-back and centre-back, a run Messi’s colleagues at Barcelona make regularly and one that allows Messi to lift the ball over the defence and give the runner a clear shot on goal, as is his wont. It could be that simple: a simple injection of energy could transform Argentina.

I would go one step further and introduce another playmaker in place of Gago – another mobile passer, like Lucas Biglia or Enzo Pérez but in an ideal world the absent Éver Banega, to take the ball and make something happen from the centre of the pitch. A third creator would mean that the opposition cannot just surround Messi and Di Maríá and know that, bar a moment of genius from the former, a goal is almost certainly not going to come. It would also give Higuaín the space to play as a lone striker, something he has done at club level for years.

arg

To me it seems a no-brainer, but a coach as cautious as Sabella would probably perceive too much risk in switching to a variant of 4-2-3-1 that this team has never played together. Admittedly, that reason is as valid as any could be – but unless they address their obvious problems, they will find themselves on the plane home very soon. If Switzerland boss Ottmar Hitzfeld plays his cards right – as he did when his unfancied side beat eventual champions Spain 1-0 in the last World Cup – then it could all be over for Sabella, Messi and company on Tuesday.

Advertisements

About robbro7

I mostly write about football but occasionally go off on one about music or film too. I talk about Argentina a lot. If you have any questions or want to get in touch, tweet me @robbro7 or send an email to robbro7 [at] gmail [dot] com.
This entry was posted in Football, Standalone and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Argentina’s Tactical Problems: Foreseeable & Likely To Be Fatal

  1. Brian says:

    Robbo I agree, Switzerland is a highly dangerous game. All looks rosy, but Sabella hasn’t built on the foundations he laid in 2012/13. We made great strides there, but we needed to go to another level to be winners. Instead he seemed to go defensive and experiment with the 3 CD’s. All that was a waste of time. ahhh…. I’m scared.

    I got a couple of posts on my thoughts and feelings for Arg as well on the link below if your interested.

  2. If Gago plays better, and Di Maria don’t gift passes then we will be just fine; it’s the same with switzerland; xhaka, shaqiri and their attack is obsolete 🙂

    • robbro7 says:

      That’s not really fair. Switzerland’s best young players are Shaqiri and Xhaka but they also attack with the left wing-back, Rodriguez, who is genuinely hugely dangerous, and Drmić, the striker, makes very good runs to create space. They can score from any set play too thanks to Rodriguez’s usually excellent delivery. Failing all else they have the long shots of İnler and probable sub Džemaili. They’re not just two players. By contrast, Argentina at the moment are just Messi and Di María. Nobody else is contributing in open play.

      • Do you really think that our team is only messi and di maria? Seriously, di maria!? He is not at his best level (at least with argentina) and he made a lot of mistakes that a counter-attacker country such as netherlands can destroy you.
        Believe it or not, we depend on gago more than anybody else, but we can easily change that by adding biglia, who’d give us more possesion and precision in the 1/2-3/4 of the pitch.
        I am quite confident that it’ll be a win for argentina (not easy, not pretty, but we’ll get there), i think we’ve got enough to make it through (against switzerland, usa and/or belgium) but that’s it; we won’t be able to beat netherlands if they reach semi-finals..

  3. Rajesh says:

    Gago is like a bomb waiting to explode for Argentina. ideally, if they get a goal advantage, they should bring in Biglia instead of Gago, or for Lavezzi.

    It is unbelievable how Argentina’s defence which looked much better in the qualifications, have become very shaky.

    De Maria too is getting lot of praises for his shots. But he is missing on lot of simple things. I thought he was very poor against Nigeria. If he had picked the right first touch or pass, there would have been more goal scoring options for Argentina.

  4. Arnab says:

    It’s quite a concerning fact that Gago sometimes slows down the midfield at times, unnecessarily.. letting down the speed of Counter Attack , which we got to see in the previous 3 games..

    Apart from playing a few good passes & long balls, Gago hasn’t been that constructive, what we would generally hope for !

    Another issue is with Pipita, he’s just completely, out of touch..

    With Aguero, prolly out of the next few games… ARG would likely play an alternative strategy in their attacking inten with Lavezzi starting, who’s alawys gonna roar in from the flanks.!!

    Again, Di Maria ‘s been amazingly, creative in the final 3rd but, his countless mispassing (which’s quite unusual)at times has cost us big time..in creating opportunities…

    In defence, Fede is just average so far… he was pretty poor v Nigeria, messes up often in the D..

    Also, Zaba still not completely, at his best !

    Overall, ARG need to do much better in the air and set-piece defending !!

    Thank GOD, Rojo is doing pretty good… , which really’s quite a surprise..

    vamosARGENTINA..

  5. arnab says:

    ^ Lucas BIGLIA, should be the plan B ! I don’t know, why Sabella had send him on the pitch ,at almost the end of the last 3 games…Otherwise, though, It’s highly unlikely, Sabella could even try Enzo. who’s also a versatile CM !

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s